Composition of the IQAC


  1. Chairperson: Head of the Institution- Dr. R.J.Temkar
  2. A few senior administrative officers—V.B.Rajale, Dr.R.P.Ghule
  3. Three to eight teachers-
    1. Dr.J.N.Nehul
    2. Prof.G.B.Lawande
    3. Prof. N.R.Kakade
    4. Prof. R.T.Gholap
    5. Prof.S.S.Patil
    6. Prof.R.B.Adling
  4. One member from the Management- Mr.J.R.Pawar (Secretary, Shri.Dadapatil Rajale Shikshan Sanstha)
  5. One/two nominees from local society, Students and Alumni –
    1. Local Society- Mr.R.Y.Mhaske
    2. Alumni- Mr.S.E.Misal
    3. Student- Ravindra Kachare
  6. One/two nominees from Employers /Industrialists/stakeholders-
    1. Mr.Shivajirao Rajale
    2. Mr. Rahul Rajale
  7. One of the senior teachers as the coordinator/Director of the IQAC- Dr.M.S.Tamboli

The composition of the IQAC will depend on the size and complexity of the institution. It helps the institutions in planning and monitoring. IQAC also gives stakeholders or beneficiaries a cross-sectional participation in the institution’s quality enhancement activities. The guidelines given here are only indicative and will help the institutions for quality sustenance activities.

The membership of such nominated members shall be for a period of two years. The IQAC should meet at least once in every quarter. The quorum for the meeting shall be two-third of the total number of members. The agenda, minutes and Action Taken Reports are to be documented with official signatures and maintained electronically in a retrievable format.

It is necessary for the members of the IQAC to shoulder the responsibilities of generating and promoting awareness in the institution and to devote time for working out the procedural details. While selecting these members several precautions need to be taken. A few of them are listed below:

It is advisable to choose persons from various backgrounds who have earned respect for integrity and excellence in their teaching and research. Moreover, they should be aware of the ground realities of the institutional environment. They should be known for their commitment to improving the quality of teaching and learning.

It would be appropriate to choose as senior administrators, persons in charge of institutional services such as library, computer center, estate, student welfare, administration, academic tasks, examination and planning and development.

The management representative should be a person who is aware of the institution’s objectives, limitations and strengths and is committed to its improvement. The local society representatives should be of high social standing and should have made significant contributions to society and in particular to education.